The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained considerable traction in geological and environmental circles, positing that human activity has become a dominant force shaping the Earth's systems, surpassing natural processes. Proponents argue that the proliferation of synthetic materials, significant alterations to the carbon cycle, and unprecedented biodiversity loss constitute a distinct stratigraphic signature. However, critics contend that the term lacks formal chronological precision, as its proposed start date varies from the advent of agriculture to the mid-20th century nuclear era. This ambiguity complicates its utility as a formal geological unit, yet it underscores a broader debate about humanity's role in planetary change. Ultimately, the discourse surrounding the Anthropocene reflects not only scientific inquiry but also ethical considerations regarding intergenerational responsibility and environmental stewardship.
❓ 文章によると、「人新世」という用語に対する主な批判は何ですか?
A. それは、地球を形成する上での自然過程の役割を過度に強調している。
B. それは、人間の活動によって引き起こされる生物多様性の損失を考慮に入れていない。
C. 地質学的な時間において、正確で合意された開始点が欠如している。
D. それは科学コミュニティの大多数によって拒否されてきました。
✅ 正确答案
It lacks a precise and agreed-upon starting point in geological time.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first