The concept of 'nudge theory,' popularized by Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein, posits that subtle changes in the way choices are presented can significantly influence human behavior without restricting freedom of choice. This approach has been widely adopted in public policy, particularly in areas like organ donation, where default options are structured to increase participation rates. However, critics argue that nudges can be manipulative, as they exploit cognitive biases that individuals may not consciously recognize. Moreover, the effectiveness of nudges is often context-dependent, varying across cultures and demographic groups. A recent meta-analysis of 126 studies found that while nudges generally produce positive effects, their magnitude is smaller than initially claimed, and publication bias may overstate their success. Thus, while nudge theory offers a cost-effective tool for behavioral change, its application requires careful ethical consideration and empirical validation.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 다음 중 넛지 이론에 대한 비판자들이 제기한 주요 우려 사항은 무엇인가?
A. 넛지는 대규모로 시행하기에는 비용이 너무 많이 든다.
B. 넛지는 무의식적 인지 편향을 이용할 수 있어 조작적일 수 있다.
C. 넛지(행동 유도 장치)는 모든 문화적 맥락에서 효과가 없는 것으로 입증되었다.
D. 넛지는 의사결정 과정에서 개인의 선택 자유를 제한한다.
✅ 正确答案
Nudges may exploit unconscious cognitive biases, making them manipulative.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first