The concept of 'nudge theory,' popularized by Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein, posits that subtle changes in the way choices are presented can significantly influence human behavior without restricting freedom of choice. This approach has been widely adopted in public policy, particularly in areas like organ donation, where default options are structured to increase participation rates. However, critics argue that nudges can be manipulative, as they exploit cognitive biases that individuals may not consciously recognize. Moreover, the effectiveness of nudges is often context-dependent, varying across cultures and demographic groups. A recent meta-analysis of 126 studies found that while nudges generally produce positive effects, their magnitude is smaller than initially claimed, and publication bias may overstate their success. Thus, while nudge theory offers a cost-effective tool for behavioral change, its application requires careful ethical consideration and empirical validation.
❓ 本文によると、ナッジ理論の批判者によって提起された主な懸念事項は次のうちどれか。
A. ナッジは大規模に実施するにはコストがかかりすぎる。
B. ナッジは無意識の認知バイアスを利用することがあり、それによって操作的になる可能性がある。
C. ナッジは、あらゆる文化的文脈において効果がないことが証明されている。
D. ナッジは、意思決定における個人の選択の自由を制限する。
✅ 正确答案
Nudges may exploit unconscious cognitive biases, making them manipulative.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first