The concept of 'cultural intelligence' (CQ) has gained prominence in organizational psychology as a framework for understanding intercultural effectiveness. Unlike emotional intelligence, which focuses on intrapersonal and interpersonal abilities within a familiar cultural context, CQ specifically addresses the capability to function effectively across diverse cultural settings. Researchers have identified four distinct dimensions of CQ: metacognitive, cognitive, motivational, and behavioral. The metacognitive dimension refers to an individual's conscious awareness and control of cultural assumptions during interactions, while the cognitive dimension encompasses knowledge of norms, practices, and conventions in different cultures. Motivational CQ reflects the drive and confidence to adapt to culturally unfamiliar situations, and behavioral CQ involves the flexibility to modify verbal and nonverbal actions appropriately. Studies suggest that high CQ predicts better job performance in multinational teams, particularly when tasks require negotiation or collaboration across cultural boundaries. However, critics argue that CQ measures often rely on self-reporting, which may overestimate actual competence, and that the construct overlaps significantly with general cognitive ability and personality traits.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 다음 중 문화적 지능(CQ) 측정의 주요 한계를 가장 잘 설명하는 것은 무엇인가?
A. A. 그들은 감성 지능에 너무 많은 초점을 맞춘다.
B. B. 이들은 자기 보고에 기반하고 있으며, 이는 부정확할 수 있다.
C. C. 그들은 문화 간 상호작용의 행동적 차원을 무시한다.
D. D. 그들은 다국적 팀에만 적용 가능하다.
✅ 正确答案
B. They are based on self-reporting, which may be inaccurate.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first