The concept of 'cultural intelligence' (CQ) has gained prominence in organizational psychology as a framework for understanding intercultural effectiveness. Unlike emotional intelligence, which focuses on intrapersonal and interpersonal abilities within a familiar cultural context, CQ specifically addresses the capability to function effectively across diverse cultural settings. Researchers have identified four distinct dimensions of CQ: metacognitive, cognitive, motivational, and behavioral. The metacognitive dimension refers to an individual's conscious awareness and control of cultural assumptions during interactions, while the cognitive dimension encompasses knowledge of norms, practices, and conventions in different cultures. Motivational CQ reflects the drive and confidence to adapt to culturally unfamiliar situations, and behavioral CQ involves the flexibility to modify verbal and nonverbal actions appropriately. Studies suggest that high CQ predicts better job performance in multinational teams, particularly when tasks require negotiation or collaboration across cultural boundaries. However, critics argue that CQ measures often rely on self-reporting, which may overestimate actual competence, and that the construct overlaps significantly with general cognitive ability and personality traits.
❓ 根据文章内容,以下哪项最能描述文化智力(CQ)测量的主要局限性?
A. A. 他们过于关注情商。
B. B. 它们基于自我报告,这可能不够准确。
C. C. 他们忽视了跨文化互动中的行为维度。
D. D. 它们仅适用于跨国团队。
✅ 正确答案
B. They are based on self-reporting, which may be inaccurate.