The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained considerable traction in geological and environmental circles, positing that human activity has become a dominant force shaping the Earth's systems. However, its formal recognition as a geological epoch remains contentious. Critics argue that the proposed markers, such as nuclear fallout or plastic pollution, are not globally synchronous or sufficiently durable to define a distinct stratigraphic boundary. Proponents counter that the sheer scale and irreversibility of human-induced changes, including climate alteration and biodiversity loss, warrant a new epoch. This debate not only reflects scientific disagreement but also underscores deeper questions about humanity's role and responsibility in planetary stewardship, as the term itself carries profound cultural and political implications.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 인류세의 공식적 인정을 둘러싼 논란의 주요 원인은 무엇인가?
A. 제안된 마커는 전 세계적으로 일관성이 있거나 충분히 오래 지속된다고 간주되지 않습니다.
B. B. 인간의 활동은 지구 시스템에 중대한 변화를 초래하지 않았다.
C. C. 이 개념은 정치적 또는 문화적 관련성이 없다.
D. D. 과학자들은 이 시기의 지질학적 경계에 대해 보편적으로 동의한다.
✅ 正确答案
A. The proposed markers are not considered globally consistent or long-lasting enough.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first