The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained considerable traction in geological and environmental circles, positing that human activity has become a dominant force shaping the Earth's systems. However, its formal recognition as a geological epoch remains contentious. Critics argue that the proposed markers, such as nuclear fallout or plastic pollution, are not globally synchronous or sufficiently durable to define a distinct stratigraphic boundary. Proponents counter that the sheer scale and irreversibility of human-induced changes, including climate alteration and biodiversity loss, warrant a new epoch. This debate not only reflects scientific disagreement but also underscores deeper questions about humanity's role and responsibility in planetary stewardship, as the term itself carries profound cultural and political implications.
❓ 根据文章内容,围绕正式承认“人类世”的争议,一个主要原因是什么?
A. A. 提案されたマーカーは、世界的に一貫しているとは見なされず、また十分に長持ちするものとも見なされていません。
B. B. 人間の活動は地球のシステムに重大な変化を引き起こしていない。
C. C. この概念には政治的・文化的な関連性はない。
D. D. 科学者たちは、この時代の地質学的境界について普遍的に同意している。
✅ 正确答案
A. The proposed markers are not considered globally consistent or long-lasting enough.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first