雅思阅读

语言: 中文 English Español 日本語 한국어 Tiếng Việt ไทย Русский

📖 Reading Passage

The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological circles, though its formal recognition remains contentious. Proponents argue that human activities, particularly since the mid-20th century, have left indelible markers in the stratigraphic record, such as radioactive isotopes from nuclear tests and microplastics in sedimentary layers. Critics, however, contend that these signals are too heterogeneous and temporally shallow to constitute a distinct geological epoch, preferring to classify them as a 'technostratigraphic event'. This debate underscores a fundamental tension: whether the Anthropocene represents a genuine planetary-scale shift or merely an accelerated phase of the existing Holocene epoch. The resolution of this question holds profound implications for how we frame environmental policy and our collective responsibility towards Earth's future.
❓ Theo đoạn văn, tại sao các nhà phê bình phản đối việc công nhận chính thức kỷ Anthropocene như một kỷ địa chất?

✅ 正确答案

Because the proposed markers are not consistent or deep enough in geological time.

IELTS Reading Tips

🎯 在线练习并获得AI解析