The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological circles, though its formal recognition remains contentious. Proponents argue that human activities, particularly since the mid-20th century, have left indelible markers in the stratigraphic record, such as radioactive isotopes from nuclear tests and microplastics in sedimentary layers. Critics, however, contend that these signals are too heterogeneous and temporally shallow to constitute a distinct geological epoch, preferring to classify them as a 'technostratigraphic event'. This debate underscores a fundamental tension: whether the Anthropocene represents a genuine planetary-scale shift or merely an accelerated phase of the existing Holocene epoch. The resolution of this question holds profound implications for how we frame environmental policy and our collective responsibility towards Earth's future.
❓ 本文によると、批評家たちはなぜ人新世を地質時代として正式に認定することに反対しているのか。
A. 人間による変化はあまりにも一様で長期間にわたるため、特徴的とは言えないからである。
B. 提案されたマーカーは地質時代において一貫性がなく、または十分に深くないためである。
C. 放射性同位体とマイクロプラスチックは陸成層にのみ存在するためです。
D. なぜなら、その概念は完新世の重要性を損なうからである。
✅ 正确答案
Because the proposed markers are not consistent or deep enough in geological time.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first