The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological circles, though its formal recognition remains contentious. Proponents argue that human activities, particularly since the mid-20th century, have left indelible markers in the stratigraphic record, such as radioactive isotopes from nuclear tests and microplastics in sedimentary layers. Critics, however, contend that these signals are too heterogeneous and temporally shallow to constitute a distinct geological epoch, preferring to classify them as a 'technostratigraphic event'. This debate underscores a fundamental tension: whether the Anthropocene represents a genuine planetary-scale shift or merely an accelerated phase of the existing Holocene epoch. The resolution of this question holds profound implications for how we frame environmental policy and our collective responsibility towards Earth's future.
❓ 본문에 따르면, 비평가들은 인류세를 지질학적 시대로 공식 인정하는 것에 왜 반대하는가?
A. 인간이 유발한 변화는 너무 균일하고 오래 지속되어 구별하기 어렵기 때문이다.
B. 제안된 마커들이 지질학적 시간상에서 일관성이 없거나 충분히 깊지 않기 때문입니다.
C. 방사성 동위원소와 미세플라스틱은 오직 육상 지층에서만 발견되기 때문이다.
D. 홀로세 시대의 중요성을 훼손하기 때문이다.
✅ 正确答案
Because the proposed markers are not consistent or deep enough in geological time.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first