The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been a subject of debate among geographers. This theory posits that the physical environment, particularly climate and topography, fundamentally shapes human societies, influencing their economic activities, cultural practices, and even political structures. While early proponents, such as Ellsworth Huntington, argued that temperate climates fostered higher levels of civilization, critics contend that this perspective oversimplifies complex human-environment interactions and often carries ethnocentric biases. Modern geography has largely moved toward 'possibilism', which acknowledges environmental constraints but emphasizes human agency and technological innovation in overcoming them. However, recent studies on climate change impacts suggest a renewed relevance of environmental factors, as rising sea levels and extreme weather events increasingly dictate migration patterns and resource allocation, thereby indirectly shaping geopolitical dynamics. This nuanced revival does not revert to crude determinism but recognizes that environmental pressures can act as significant catalysts for societal change, especially in vulnerable regions.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 환경 영향에 대한 현대적 관점은 초기 환경 결정론과 어떻게 다른가?
A. A) 그것은 인간 사회를 형성하는 데 있어 환경의 어떤 역할도 완전히 거부한다.
B. B) 기후를 문화 발전의 주요 결정 요인으로만 초점을 맞춘다.
C. C) 환경적 제약을 인정하면서도 인간의 적응력과 혁신성을 강조한다.
D. D) 기술 혁신이 사회에 대한 환경적 영향을 완전히 제거할 수 있다고 주장한다.
✅ 正确答案
C) It acknowledges environmental constraints while emphasizing human adaptability and innovation.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first