The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been a subject of debate among geographers. This theory posits that the physical environment, particularly climate and topography, fundamentally shapes human societies, influencing their economic activities, cultural practices, and even political structures. While early proponents, such as Ellsworth Huntington, argued that temperate climates fostered higher levels of civilization, critics contend that this perspective oversimplifies complex human-environment interactions and often carries ethnocentric biases. Modern geography has largely moved toward 'possibilism', which acknowledges environmental constraints but emphasizes human agency and technological innovation in overcoming them. However, recent studies on climate change impacts suggest a renewed relevance of environmental factors, as rising sea levels and extreme weather events increasingly dictate migration patterns and resource allocation, thereby indirectly shaping geopolitical dynamics. This nuanced revival does not revert to crude determinism but recognizes that environmental pressures can act as significant catalysts for societal change, especially in vulnerable regions.
❓ 本文によると、環境影響に関する現代の視点は、初期の環境決定論とどのように異なるのでしょうか?
A. A) それは、人間社会を形成する上での環境の役割を完全に否定する。
B. B) それは文化の発展の主要な決定要因として、もっぱら気候に焦点を当てている。
C. C) 環境的制約を認識しつつも、人間の適応力と革新性を強調している。
D. D) 技術革新が環境が社会に与える影響を完全に排除できると主張している。
✅ 正确答案
C) It acknowledges environmental constraints while emphasizing human adaptability and innovation.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first