The concept of 'environmental justice' emerged in the 1980s, highlighting the disproportionate burden of environmental hazards borne by marginalized communities. Unlike traditional environmentalism, which often focuses on wilderness preservation, environmental justice prioritizes human well-being, especially for low-income and minority groups. Research has shown that polluting facilities, such as waste treatment plants and factories, are frequently sited in these neighborhoods, leading to higher rates of respiratory diseases and other health issues. This pattern is not accidental but often results from systemic inequalities in land-use planning, zoning laws, and political representation. Addressing environmental injustice requires not only regulatory reforms but also empowering affected communities to participate meaningfully in decision-making processes. Scholars argue that without such inclusive approaches, environmental policies risk perpetuating existing social disparities rather than alleviating them.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 전통적 환경주의와 환경 정의 사이의 주요 차이점은 무엇인가?
A. 전통적 환경주의는 인간 건강에 초점을 맞추는 반면, 환경 정의는 황야에 초점을 맞춘다.
B. 전통적 환경주의는 야생 자연 보존을 우선시하는 반면, 환경 정의는 소외된 지역사회에서의 인간 복지를 우선시한다.
C. 환경 정의는 주로 정치적 대표성에 관한 것이며, 전통적 환경주의는 오염 통제에 관한 것입니다.
D. 환경 정의는 규제 개혁에 초점을 맞추는 반면, 전통적 환경주의는 정책 변화를 회피한다.
✅ 正确答案
Traditional environmentalism prioritizes wilderness preservation, while environmental justice prioritizes human well-being in marginalized communities.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first