The concept of 'ecological footprint' has gained traction as a metric for assessing human impact on the environment. It measures the amount of biologically productive land and water area required to produce the resources an individual, population, or activity consumes and to absorb the waste it generates, given prevailing technology and resource management. While intuitively appealing, the metric is not without criticism. Some scholars argue that its aggregated nature masks significant regional variations in resource use and environmental degradation. Others contend that it oversimplifies complex ecological dynamics, potentially leading to misguided policy decisions. Despite these limitations, the ecological footprint remains a valuable educational tool, fostering public awareness about the uneven distribution of resource consumption across the globe. Its capacity to translate abstract environmental concepts into tangible spatial terms facilitates broader engagement with sustainability issues.
❓ Согласно тексту, какова основная критика показателя экологического следа?
A. Это слишком сложно для понимания широкой публикой.
B. Он не учитывает региональные различия в использовании ресурсов.
C. Оно чрезмерно подчеркивает роль технологий в устойчивом развитии.
D. Он не учитывает способности к поглощению отходов.
✅ 正确答案
It fails to account for regional differences in resource use.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first