The concept of 'ecological footprint' has gained traction as a metric for assessing human impact on the environment. It measures the amount of biologically productive land and water area required to produce the resources an individual, population, or activity consumes and to absorb the waste it generates, given prevailing technology and resource management. While intuitively appealing, the metric is not without criticism. Some scholars argue that its aggregated nature masks significant regional variations in resource use and environmental degradation. Others contend that it oversimplifies complex ecological dynamics, potentially leading to misguided policy decisions. Despite these limitations, the ecological footprint remains a valuable educational tool, fostering public awareness about the uneven distribution of resource consumption across the globe. Its capacity to translate abstract environmental concepts into tangible spatial terms facilitates broader engagement with sustainability issues.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 생태발자국 지표에 대한 주요 비판은 무엇인가?
A. 일반 대중이 이해하기에는 너무 복잡하다.
B. 이는 자원 사용에 있어 지역적 차이를 설명하지 못한다.
C. 지속 가능성에 있어 기술의 역할을 과도하게 강조하고 있다.
D. 폐기물 흡수 능력을 고려하지 않는다.
✅ 正确答案
It fails to account for regional differences in resource use.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first