The concept of 'neurodiversity' has gained significant traction in recent years, challenging traditional views of neurological conditions such as autism and ADHD as deficits to be corrected. Proponents argue that these variations in brain function are natural and should be respected, much like biodiversity in ecosystems. This perspective shifts the focus from remediation to accommodation, advocating for societal changes that enable individuals with diverse neurological profiles to thrive. Critics, however, caution that an overemphasis on neurodiversity may downplay the genuine challenges faced by some individuals, particularly those with severe impairments who require intensive support. They contend that while acceptance is crucial, it should not preclude access to therapeutic interventions that can improve quality of life. Ultimately, the debate reflects a broader tension between celebrating difference and addressing disability, a balance that requires nuanced policy and practice.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 신경다양성 운동에 대한 비판자들의 주요 주장은 무엇인가?
A. A) 심각한 장애를 가진 개인을 위한 치료적 개입의 필요성을 무시한다.
B. B) 이는 인간 뇌 기능의 자연적 변이를 과대평가한다.
C. C) 신경다양성 개인을 위한 적절한 편의를 제공하지 못한다.
D. D) 이는 신경학적 상태에 대한 결핍 기반 관점을 조장한다.
✅ 正确答案
A) It ignores the need for therapeutic interventions for severely impaired individuals.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first