The concept of 'neurodiversity' has gained significant traction in recent years, challenging traditional views of neurological conditions such as autism and ADHD as deficits to be corrected. Proponents argue that these variations in brain function are natural and should be respected, much like biodiversity in ecosystems. This perspective shifts the focus from remediation to accommodation, advocating for societal changes that enable individuals with diverse neurological profiles to thrive. Critics, however, caution that an overemphasis on neurodiversity may downplay the genuine challenges faced by some individuals, particularly those with severe impairments who require intensive support. They contend that while acceptance is crucial, it should not preclude access to therapeutic interventions that can improve quality of life. Ultimately, the debate reflects a broader tension between celebrating difference and addressing disability, a balance that requires nuanced policy and practice.
❓ 本文によると、神経多様性運動に対する批評家たちの主な主張は何ですか?
A. A) それは、重度の障害を持つ個人に対する治療的介入の必要性を無視している。
B. B) それは人間の脳機能における自然な変動を過大評価している。
C. C) 神経多様性を持つ個人に対して十分な配慮を提供できていない。
D. D) それは神経学的状態に対する欠陥基盤の見方を促進する。
✅ 正确答案
A) It ignores the need for therapeutic interventions for severely impaired individuals.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first