The concept of 'cultural intelligence' (CQ) has gained prominence in organizational psychology as a framework for understanding why some individuals adapt more effectively to multicultural environments than others. Unlike general cognitive ability, CQ encompasses four distinct dimensions: metacognitive, cognitive, motivational, and behavioral. Metacognitive CQ refers to the conscious awareness of cultural assumptions during interactions, while cognitive CQ involves knowledge of norms and practices across cultures. Motivational CQ reflects the intrinsic interest and confidence in adapting, and behavioral CQ is the capability to exhibit appropriate verbal and non-verbal actions. Research indicates that high CQ predicts better job performance in diverse teams, yet it is often overlooked in recruitment processes that prioritize technical skills. Critics argue, however, that CQ may overlap with personality traits such as openness, raising questions about its unique predictive validity. Nevertheless, the construct has practical implications for training programs aimed at enhancing cross-cultural competence.
❓ 根据文章内容,以下哪项最能描述批评者对文化智能提出的主要担忧?
A. A. 在实际环境中,CQ(文化智商)过于难以衡量。
B. B. 文化智力可能与某些人格特质并无显著区别。
C. C. 在招聘中,CQ(文化智商)不如技术技能重要。
D. D. 文化智商培训项目在提升能力方面效果不佳。
✅ 正确答案
B. CQ may not be distinct from certain personality traits.