The concept of 'cultural intelligence' (CQ) has gained traction in organizational psychology as a complement to traditional measures of cognitive ability. Unlike IQ, which focuses on abstract reasoning, CQ encompasses the capability to function effectively across national, ethnic, and organizational cultures. Researchers argue that CQ comprises four distinct dimensions: metacognitive, cognitive, motivational, and behavioral. Metacognitive CQ refers to an individual's conscious awareness of cultural assumptions, while cognitive CQ involves knowledge of cultural norms and practices. Motivational CQ reflects the drive to adapt, and behavioral CQ pertains to the ability to exhibit appropriate verbal and nonverbal actions. Studies suggest that high CQ predicts success in cross-border negotiations and multicultural teamwork, even after controlling for personality traits. However, critics caution that CQ measurement often relies on self-report, which may be subject to social desirability bias, and that the construct overlaps significantly with emotional intelligence. Despite these debates, CQ training programs have been widely adopted in multinational corporations, aiming to enhance expatriate adjustment and global leadership performance.
❓ 根据文章所述,当前文化智力(CQ)评估的一个主要局限是什么?
A. A. 它忽视了人格特质在跨文化效能中的作用。
B. B. 它依赖于可能受社会期望偏差影响的自我报告测量方法。
C. C. 它过分强调行为层面,却忽视了认知成分。
D. D. 它仅适用于组织环境,不适用于其他情境。
✅ 正确答案
B. It relies on self-report measures that may be affected by social desirability bias.