The concept of 'environmental determinism,' which posits that human behavior and societal development are largely shaped by climatic and geographical conditions, has been largely discredited in modern geography. Critics argue that it oversimplifies complex human-environment interactions and ignores the role of human agency, technology, and cultural adaptation. However, a nuanced perspective, often termed 'possibilism,' acknowledges that while the environment imposes certain constraints, it does not dictate outcomes. Instead, it offers a range of possibilities, and human choices within these limits are influenced by historical, social, and economic factors. This framework has gained traction in studies of climate change adaptation, where communities' resilience is seen not merely as a product of their physical environment, but as a dynamic interplay between environmental risks, institutional capacity, and local knowledge. Thus, contemporary research emphasizes the need to move beyond crude causal links and towards a more integrated understanding of socio-environmental systems.
❓ 지문에 따르면, '환경 결정론'의 주요 한계는 무엇인가?
A. 그것은 인간의 선택과 문화적 요인의 역할을 설명하지 못한다.
B. 그것은 기술이 사회에 미치는 영향을 과대평가한다.
C. 환경의 물리적 제약을 무시한다.
D. 제도적 역량에 너무 초점을 맞추고 있다.
✅ 正确答案
It fails to account for the role of human choices and cultural factors.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first