The concept of 'environmental determinism,' which posits that human behavior and societal development are largely shaped by climatic and geographical conditions, has been largely discredited in modern geography. Critics argue that it oversimplifies complex human-environment interactions and ignores the role of human agency, technology, and cultural adaptation. However, a nuanced perspective, often termed 'possibilism,' acknowledges that while the environment imposes certain constraints, it does not dictate outcomes. Instead, it offers a range of possibilities, and human choices within these limits are influenced by historical, social, and economic factors. This framework has gained traction in studies of climate change adaptation, where communities' resilience is seen not merely as a product of their physical environment, but as a dynamic interplay between environmental risks, institutional capacity, and local knowledge. Thus, contemporary research emphasizes the need to move beyond crude causal links and towards a more integrated understanding of socio-environmental systems.