The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout from atomic tests, and elevated carbon dioxide levels are distinctive enough to warrant a formal designation. However, critics contend that these changes, while profound, do not yet meet the strict criteria for a geological epoch, which traditionally requires a clear, global stratigraphic boundary visible in rock layers. They emphasize that the Holocene, the current interglacial period, already encompasses significant human activity, and defining a new epoch risks oversimplifying the complex interplay between natural and anthropogenic processes. This debate highlights the tension between scientific classification and the need to communicate urgent environmental concerns.
❓ В чем заключается основное разногласие между сторонниками и критиками антропоцена как геологической эпохи?
A. A. Является ли воздействие человека на окружающую среду достаточно значительным, чтобы его изучать
B. B. Соответствуют ли предлагаемые маркеры установленным критериям геологической эпохи
C. C. Следует ли продлить голоценовую эпоху, чтобы включить в неё больше человеческой деятельности
D. D. Являются ли пластиковое загрязнение и радиоактивные осадки вредными для экосистем
✅ 正确答案
B. Whether the proposed markers meet the established criteria for a geological epoch
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first