The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout from atomic tests, and elevated carbon dioxide levels are distinctive enough to warrant a formal designation. However, critics contend that these changes, while profound, do not yet meet the strict criteria for a geological epoch, which traditionally requires a clear, global stratigraphic boundary visible in rock layers. They emphasize that the Holocene, the current interglacial period, already encompasses significant human activity, and defining a new epoch risks oversimplifying the complex interplay between natural and anthropogenic processes. This debate highlights the tension between scientific classification and the need to communicate urgent environmental concerns.
❓ 인류세를 지질학적 시대로 보는 지지자들과 비판자들 사이의 주요 쟁점은 무엇인가?
A. A. 인간이 환경에 미치는 영향이 연구할 만큼 충분히 중요한지 여부
B. B. 제안된 지표들이 지질 시대(epoch)에 대한 기존 기준을 충족하는지 여부
C. C. 홀로세 시대가 더 많은 인간 활동을 포함하도록 연장되어야 하는지 여부
D. D. 플라스틱 오염과 핵 낙진이 생태계에 해로운지 여부
✅ 正确答案
B. Whether the proposed markers meet the established criteria for a geological epoch
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first