The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been debated in geography. This theory posits that human behavior and societal development are largely shaped by physical environmental conditions, such as climate and topography. Proponents argue that tropical climates, with their abundant resources, historically hindered the need for technological innovation, whereas temperate zones, with their seasonal variations, encouraged agricultural planning and industrial advancement. However, critics contend that this perspective oversimplifies complex human-environment interactions and often leads to deterministic and even ethnocentric conclusions. Modern scholarship emphasizes 'possibilism', which acknowledges environmental constraints but highlights human agency and cultural adaptation. For instance, the Netherlands, despite its low-lying geography, has thrived through sophisticated water management systems, demonstrating that human ingenuity can overcome natural limitations. Thus, while environment plays a role, it is not the sole determinant of societal outcomes.
❓ Какой основной аргумент критиков против экологического детерминизма, согласно данному отрывку?
A. A. Это игнорирует роль человеческого творчества и культурной адаптации.
B. B. Это чрезмерно подчёркивает влияние умеренного климата на инновации.
C. C. Он не признает изобилие ресурсов в тропических районах.
D. D. Это предполагает, что все общества развиваются одинаковым образом.
✅ 正确答案
A. It ignores the role of human creativity and cultural adaptation.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first