The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been debated in geography. This theory posits that human behavior and societal development are largely shaped by physical environmental conditions, such as climate and topography. Proponents argue that tropical climates, with their abundant resources, historically hindered the need for technological innovation, whereas temperate zones, with their seasonal variations, encouraged agricultural planning and industrial advancement. However, critics contend that this perspective oversimplifies complex human-environment interactions and often leads to deterministic and even ethnocentric conclusions. Modern scholarship emphasizes 'possibilism', which acknowledges environmental constraints but highlights human agency and cultural adaptation. For instance, the Netherlands, despite its low-lying geography, has thrived through sophisticated water management systems, demonstrating that human ingenuity can overcome natural limitations. Thus, while environment plays a role, it is not the sole determinant of societal outcomes.
❓ 비판자들이 본문에 따르면 환경 결정론에 대해 제기하는 주요 논거는 무엇인가?
A. A. 그것은 인간의 창의성과 문화적 적응의 역할을 무시한다.
B. B. 그것은 온대 기후가 혁신에 미치는 영향을 지나치게 강조한다.
C. C. 그것은 열대 지역의 풍부한 자원을 인식하지 못한다.
D. D. 그것은 모든 사회가 동일한 방식으로 발전한다는 것을 시사한다.
✅ 正确答案
A. It ignores the role of human creativity and cultural adaptation.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first