The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental discourse, positing that human activity has become the dominant influence on the Earth's geology and ecosystems. While the term was popularized by atmospheric chemist Paul Crutzen in 2000, its formal recognition as a geological epoch remains contentious. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence. Critics, however, contend that the Anthropocene lacks a distinct and globally synchronous boundary, unlike previous epochs defined by natural transitions. Furthermore, some scholars question whether framing human impact as a geological event obscures the uneven responsibilities of different societies, as industrialized nations have contributed disproportionately to environmental change. This debate underscores the intersection of science, politics, and ethics in defining our current era.
❓ 일부 학자들이 인류세를 지질학적 시대로 공식 인정하는 것에 반대하는 주요 이유는 무엇인가?
A. A. 그들은 인간의 영향이 지질을 변화시킬 만큼 충분히 중요하지 않다고 믿는다.
B. B. 제안된 마커는 너무 최근 것이며 널리 분포되어 있지 않습니다.
C. C. 그것은 명확한 전 지구적 경계를 결여하고 있으며, 불평등한 책임을 간과할 수 있다.
D. D. 이 용어는 지질학자가 아닌 사람에 의해 대중화되었으며 비과학적이다.
✅ 正确答案
C. It lacks a clear global boundary and may overlook unequal responsibility.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first