The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental discourse, positing that human activity has become the dominant influence on the Earth's geology and ecosystems. While the term was popularized by atmospheric chemist Paul Crutzen in 2000, its formal recognition as a geological epoch remains contentious. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence. Critics, however, contend that the Anthropocene lacks a distinct and globally synchronous boundary, unlike previous epochs defined by natural transitions. Furthermore, some scholars question whether framing human impact as a geological event obscures the uneven responsibilities of different societies, as industrialized nations have contributed disproportionately to environmental change. This debate underscores the intersection of science, politics, and ethics in defining our current era.
❓ ¿Cuál es la razón principal por la que algunos académicos se oponen al reconocimiento formal del Antropoceno como una época geológica?
A. A. Creen que el impacto humano no es lo suficientemente significativo como para alterar la geología.
B. B. Los marcadores propuestos son demasiado recientes y no están ampliamente distribuidos.
C. C. Carece de un límite global claro y puede pasar por alto la responsabilidad desigual.
D. D. El término fue popularizado por un no geólogo y es poco científico.
✅ 正确答案
C. It lacks a clear global boundary and may overlook unequal responsibility.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first