The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental discourse, positing that human activity has become the dominant influence on the Earth's geology and ecosystems. While the term was popularized by atmospheric chemist Paul Crutzen in 2000, its formal recognition as a geological epoch remains contentious. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence. Critics, however, contend that the Anthropocene lacks a distinct and globally synchronous boundary, unlike previous epochs defined by natural transitions. Furthermore, some scholars question whether framing human impact as a geological event obscures the uneven responsibilities of different societies, as industrialized nations have contributed disproportionately to environmental change. This debate underscores the intersection of science, politics, and ethics in defining our current era.
❓ 一部の学者が、人新世を地質時代として正式に認定することに反対する主な理由は何ですか?
A. A. 彼らは、人間の影響は地質を変えるほど重要ではないと信じている。
B. B. 提案されたマーカーはあまりにも最近のものであり、広く分布していない。
C. C. 明確な地球規模の境界線が欠如しており、不平等な責任を見落とす可能性がある。
D. D. この用語は地質学者ではない人物によって広められ、非科学的である。
✅ 正确答案
C. It lacks a clear global boundary and may overlook unequal responsibility.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first