The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental discourse, positing that human activity has become a dominant force shaping Earth's systems. Proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels constitute a distinct stratigraphic signature, warranting a new geological epoch. However, critics contend that the term lacks precise temporal boundaries and that its formalization may obscure the uneven responsibilities of different societies for environmental change. This debate underscores a broader tension between natural science classifications and socio-political narratives, raising questions about how humanity's impact is measured and who bears the ethical burden of mitigation.