The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental discourse, positing that human activity has become a dominant force shaping Earth's systems. Proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels constitute a distinct stratigraphic signature, warranting a new geological epoch. However, critics contend that the term lacks precise temporal boundaries and that its formalization may obscure the uneven responsibilities of different societies for environmental change. This debate underscores a broader tension between natural science classifications and socio-political narratives, raising questions about how humanity's impact is measured and who bears the ethical burden of mitigation.
❓ Согласно тексту, какова основная критика формализации антропоцена как геологической эпохи?
A. A. Это игнорирует роль естественной изменчивости климата.
B. B. Он не обеспечивает четких хронологических границ и может скрывать неравный вклад в изменение окружающей среды.
C. C. Это чрезмерно подчёркивает важность пластикового загрязнения как маркера.
D. D. Она отвергает необходимость международного сотрудничества в области климатической политики.
✅ 正确答案
B. It fails to provide clear chronological limits and may hide unequal contributions to environmental change.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first