The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental discourse, positing that human activities have become a dominant force shaping Earth's systems. While the term was popularized by atmospheric chemist Paul Crutzen in 2000, its formal recognition as a geological epoch remains contentious. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout, and elevated carbon dioxide levels constitute a distinct stratigraphic signature. However, critics contend that the Anthropocene lacks a clear, synchronous beginning, unlike formal epochs which are defined by global, abrupt transitions in rock layers. This debate highlights a fundamental tension: whether geological classification should reflect planetary-scale human impact or adhere strictly to traditional stratigraphic criteria. The resolution of this issue carries implications beyond geology, influencing how societies perceive their environmental responsibilities and historical narrative.
❓ 본문에 따르면, 인류세에 관한 주요 논쟁점은 무엇인가?
A. 인간 활동이 지구의 시스템을 크게 변화시켰는지 여부
B. 인류세가 지질학적 시대로서의 공식 기준을 충족하는지 여부
C. 플라스틱 오염이 인간의 영향에 대한 신뢰할 수 있는 지표인가
D. 이 용어가 폴 크루첸에 의해 대중화되었는지 여부
✅ 正确答案
Whether the Anthropocene meets the formal criteria for a geological epoch
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first