The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental discourse, positing that human activities have become a dominant force shaping Earth's systems. While the term was popularized by atmospheric chemist Paul Crutzen in 2000, its formal recognition as a geological epoch remains contentious. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout, and elevated carbon dioxide levels constitute a distinct stratigraphic signature. However, critics contend that the Anthropocene lacks a clear, synchronous beginning, unlike formal epochs which are defined by global, abrupt transitions in rock layers. This debate highlights a fundamental tension: whether geological classification should reflect planetary-scale human impact or adhere strictly to traditional stratigraphic criteria. The resolution of this issue carries implications beyond geology, influencing how societies perceive their environmental responsibilities and historical narrative.
❓ この文章によると、人新世をめぐる主な論争点は何ですか?
A. 人間の活動が地球のシステムを大きく変えたかどうか
B. 人新世が地質時代の正式な基準を満たすかどうか
C. プラスチック汚染は、人間の影響の信頼できる指標となるか
D. その用語がポール・クルッツェンによって広められたかどうか
✅ 正确答案
Whether the Anthropocene meets the formal criteria for a geological epoch
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first