The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been debated in geographical studies. Early proponents argued that human behavior and societal development were largely shaped by climatic conditions and physical geography. However, this perspective was criticized for oversimplifying complex cultural interactions and for justifying colonial expansion. Modern geography rejects such linear causality, emphasizing instead the nuanced ways in which societies adapt to and modify their environments. Recent research highlights that technological innovation and social organization can significantly mitigate environmental constraints, while also acknowledging that environmental factors remain influential in shaping vulnerabilities, particularly in regions with limited resources. This shift reflects a broader move towards interdisciplinary approaches that integrate ecological, economic, and political analyses.
❓ 본문에서 언급된 초기 환경 결정론에 대한 주요 비판은 무엇인가?
A. A. 그것은 인간 사회에서 기후의 역할을 무시했다.
B. B. 그것은 문화적 상호작용을 지나치게 단순화했으며 식민주의를 지지했다.
C. C. 그것은 기술 혁신에 너무 많은 중점을 두었다.
D. D. 지리적 차이를 세부적으로 고려하지 못했다.
✅ 正确答案
B. It overly simplified cultural interactions and supported colonialism.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first