The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been a subject of debate among geographers. This theory posits that human behavior and societal development are largely shaped by the physical environment, such as climate and topography. Early proponents, like Ellsworth Huntington, argued that temperate climates fostered higher levels of civilization, while tropical regions lagged due to heat-induced lethargy. However, modern scholars have largely rejected this view, pointing to counterexamples where societies in similar environments developed differently, and emphasizing the role of human agency, technology, and cultural exchange. Instead, they favor 'possibilism', which suggests that the environment offers a range of possibilities, and human choices determine which are realized. This shift reflects a broader move towards understanding complex human-environment interactions without reducing causality to a single factor.
❓ 본문에 따르면, 현대 학자들이 지적한 환경 결정론의 주요 한계는 무엇인가?
A. A) 그것은 사회를 형성하는 데 있어 기술의 역할을 과도하게 강조한다.
B. B) 그것은 기후가 인간의 에너지 수준에 미치는 영향을 무시한다.
C. C) 이는 유사한 환경 내에서의 사회 발전 차이를 설명하지 못한다.
D. D) 열대 지역에서의 문화 교류의 중요성을 과소평가한다.
✅ 正确答案
C) It fails to account for variations in societal development within similar environments.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first