The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been debated in geography. Early theorists argued that human behavior and societal development were largely shaped by climatic and topographical conditions. However, this perspective was criticized for oversimplifying complex cultural dynamics and for justifying colonial narratives. Modern scholarship, such as the work of Jared Diamond, revisits this idea with more nuance, suggesting that environmental factors can influence, but not dictate, the trajectory of civilizations. Diamond emphasizes that technological innovation and cultural exchange often mitigate environmental constraints. Yet, critics contend that even this refined approach underestimates human agency and the role of historical contingencies. Thus, while environmental conditions provide a backdrop, they do not solely determine outcomes. This ongoing discourse highlights the need for interdisciplinary approaches that integrate ecological, historical, and sociological perspectives.
❓ 이 글의 주요 요점은 무엇인가?
A. 환경 결정론은 사회 발전을 완전히 설명한다.
B. 현대 학자들은 문명에 대한 어떠한 환경적 영향도 완전히 거부한다.
C. 환경적 요인은 중요하지만 사회 발전의 유일한 결정 요인은 아니다.
D. 재러드 다이아몬드의 연구는 비판 없이 널리 받아들여지고 있다.
✅ 正确答案
Environmental factors are significant but not the only determinants of societal progress.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first