The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been debated in geography. Early theorists argued that human behavior and societal development were largely shaped by climatic and topographical conditions. However, this perspective was criticized for oversimplifying complex cultural dynamics and for justifying colonial narratives. Modern scholarship, such as the work of Jared Diamond, revisits this idea with more nuance, suggesting that environmental factors can influence, but not dictate, the trajectory of civilizations. Diamond emphasizes that technological innovation and cultural exchange often mitigate environmental constraints. Yet, critics contend that even this refined approach underestimates human agency and the role of historical contingencies. Thus, while environmental conditions provide a backdrop, they do not solely determine outcomes. This ongoing discourse highlights the need for interdisciplinary approaches that integrate ecological, historical, and sociological perspectives.
❓ Какова основная мысль этого отрывка?
A. Экологический детерминизм полностью объясняет развитие общества.
B. Современные учёные полностью отвергают любое влияние окружающей среды на цивилизации.
C. Экологические факторы значимы, но не являются единственными детерминантами общественного прогресса.
D. Работы Джареда Даймонда широко принимаются без критики.
✅ 正确答案
Environmental factors are significant but not the only determinants of societal progress.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first