The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental circles, proposing that human activities have become a dominant force shaping Earth's systems. While the term is not yet formally recognized as a new geological epoch, its proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear evidence of a distinct human-driven stratigraphic layer. Critics, however, contend that the Anthropocene lacks the clear chronological boundaries required for formal geological classification, and that its adoption may oversimplify the complex, uneven nature of human impact across different regions and periods. Nevertheless, the debate has spurred valuable interdisciplinary research, highlighting the urgent need to address humanity's profound and lasting influence on planetary processes.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 인류세 개념에 대한 주요 비판은 무엇인가?
A. A. 그것은 지구 시스템에 대한 인간의 긍정적 기여에 너무 집중되어 있다.
B. B. 그것은 공식적인 지질학적 분류에 명확한 연대학적 경계를 제공하지 못한다.
C. C. 그것은 인간 영향의 지역적 차이를 지나치게 강조한다.
D. D. 이는 핵 낙진이나 플라스틱 오염과 같은 어떠한 과학적 증거로도 뒷받침되지 않습니다.
✅ 正确答案
B. It fails to provide clear chronological boundaries for formal geological classification.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first