The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental circles, proposing that human activities have become a dominant force shaping Earth's systems. While the term is not yet formally recognized as a new geological epoch, its proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear evidence of a distinct human-driven stratigraphic layer. Critics, however, contend that the Anthropocene lacks the clear chronological boundaries required for formal geological classification, and that its adoption may oversimplify the complex, uneven nature of human impact across different regions and periods. Nevertheless, the debate has spurred valuable interdisciplinary research, highlighting the urgent need to address humanity's profound and lasting influence on planetary processes.
❓ 本文によると、人新世の概念に対する主な批判は何か。
A. A. 地球システムに対する人間の肯定的な貢献に焦点を当てすぎている。
B. B. 正式な地質分類に対して明確な年代境界を提供できない。
C. C. それは人間の影響における地域的変動を過度に強調している。
D. D. それは核降下物やプラスチック汚染のような科学的証拠によって一切裏付けられていない。
✅ 正确答案
B. It fails to provide clear chronological boundaries for formal geological classification.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first