The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained considerable traction in geological and environmental circles, yet its formal recognition remains contentious. Proponents argue that human activities have fundamentally altered Earth's systems, leaving a distinct stratigraphic signature characterized by radioactive isotopes, plastic debris, and elevated carbon dioxide levels. However, skeptics within the geological community contend that the term lacks the temporal depth required for a formal epoch, suggesting instead that these changes are more aptly described as a 'geological event' within the Holocene. This debate is not merely semantic; it influences how scientists, policymakers, and the public perceive humanity's role in shaping planetary history, with implications for conservation strategies and global governance.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 인류세에 관한 주요 논쟁점은 무엇인가?
A. 인간 활동이 심각한 환경 변화를 초래했는지 여부
B. 이 용어가 공식적으로 지질 시대(epoch)로 인정되어야 하는지, 아니면 사건(event)으로 설명되어야 하는지에 대한 문제입니다.
C. 플라스틱 잔해물과 방사성 동위원소가 인간의 영향에 대한 신뢰할 수 있는 지표인지 여부
D. 인류세가 보전과 거버넌스에 시사하는 바가 있는지 여부
✅ 正确答案
Whether the term should be formally recognized as a geological epoch or described as an event
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first