The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained considerable traction in geological and environmental circles, yet its formal recognition remains contentious. Proponents argue that human activities have fundamentally altered Earth's systems, leaving a distinct stratigraphic signature characterized by radioactive isotopes, plastic debris, and elevated carbon dioxide levels. However, skeptics within the geological community contend that the term lacks the temporal depth required for a formal epoch, suggesting instead that these changes are more aptly described as a 'geological event' within the Holocene. This debate is not merely semantic; it influences how scientists, policymakers, and the public perceive humanity's role in shaping planetary history, with implications for conservation strategies and global governance.
❓ 文章によると、人新世に関する意見の相違の主な論点は何か。
A. 人間の活動が重大な環境変化を引き起こしたかどうか
B. この用語が正式に地質時代として認識されるべきか、それとも出来事として記述されるべきか。
C. プラスチックごみと放射性同位体が、人間の影響の信頼できる指標となるかどうか
D. アントロポセンが保全とガバナンスに影響を及ぼすかどうか
✅ 正确答案
Whether the term should be formally recognized as a geological epoch or described as an event
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first