The concept of 'slow tourism' has gained traction among scholars as a counterpoint to mass tourism. Unlike conventional travel, which prioritizes efficiency and the accumulation of sights, slow tourism emphasizes immersive experiences, longer stays, and meaningful engagement with local cultures and environments. Researchers argue that this approach can mitigate the negative impacts of overtourism, such as environmental degradation and cultural commodification. However, critics contend that slow tourism remains an elite practice, accessible primarily to those with flexible schedules and disposable income, thereby potentially reinforcing social inequalities. Furthermore, the environmental benefits are not always clear-cut, as longer stays may still involve significant carbon footprints from long-haul travel. Thus, while slow tourism offers a promising alternative, its viability as a sustainable model requires careful consideration of both its social and ecological implications.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 슬로우 관광에 대한 주요 비판은 무엇인가?
A. 이는 대중 관광보다 더 빠른 환경 파괴를 초래합니다.
B. 주로 특권층에게만 제공되어 불평등을 악화시킬 수 있다.
C. 이는 관광객과 현지인 간의 문화 교류를 저해한다.
D. 인기 관광지의 관광객 수를 줄이는 데 실패한다.
✅ 正确答案
It is mainly available to privileged groups, which may worsen inequality.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first