The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout from atomic tests, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence of human activity. However, critics contend that the term lacks a precise starting date, as human influence has been gradual and varied across regions. They also note that formalizing the Anthropocene might obscure the uneven responsibilities of different societies for environmental change, potentially diluting political accountability. Despite these debates, the term serves a crucial heuristic purpose, prompting interdisciplinary research and public discourse about humanity's role in shaping planetary futures. Understanding this controversy is essential for evaluating both scientific classification and its socio-political implications.
❓ 본문에 따르면, 인류세를 지질학적 시대로 공식화하는 것에 대한 주요 비판 중 하나는 무엇인가?
A. 방사성 표지자에 너무 많이 의존한다.
B. 이는 서로 다른 사회들이 환경 변화에 기여하는 정도의 불평등을 숨길 수 있다.
C. 인간 활동에 대한 층서학적 증거가 전혀 없다.
D. 그것은 이미 대부분의 지질학자들에 의해 거부되었다.
✅ 正确答案
It may hide unequal contributions of different societies to environmental change.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first