The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout from atomic tests, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence of human activity. However, critics contend that the term lacks a precise starting date, as human influence has been gradual and varied across regions. They also note that formalizing the Anthropocene might obscure the uneven responsibilities of different societies for environmental change, potentially diluting political accountability. Despite these debates, the term serves a crucial heuristic purpose, prompting interdisciplinary research and public discourse about humanity's role in shaping planetary futures. Understanding this controversy is essential for evaluating both scientific classification and its socio-political implications.
❓ 根据文章,将人类世正式确立为一个地质时代的一个主要批评是什么?
A. 放射性マーカーに依存しすぎている。
B. それは、環境変化に対する異なる社会の不平等な貢献を隠す可能性がある。
C. 層序学的な証拠が人間の活動を示すものは何もない。
D. 既に大多数の地質学者によって否定されている。
✅ 正确答案
It may hide unequal contributions of different societies to environmental change.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first