The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch characterized by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence of human influence. However, critics contend that the term is more cultural than scientific, pointing to the difficulty of defining a precise start date, with suggestions ranging from the advent of agriculture to the mid-20th century. They also note that geological epochs typically span millions of years, whereas human impact, though profound, is relatively recent. This debate highlights the tension between scientific classification and the urgency of environmental advocacy, raising questions about how we formalize our current era.
❓ Согласно тексту, в чем заключается основной пункт разногласий среди критиков относительно антропоцена?
A. A) Отсутствие достаточных маркеров, таких как загрязнение пластиком
B. B) Сложность в установлении чёткой и согласованной отправной точки
C. C) Отсутствие человеческого влияния на геологические процессы
D. D) Предложение о том, что его следует классифицировать как культурный, а не научный термин
✅ 正确答案
B) The difficulty in establishing a clear and agreed-upon starting point
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first