The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch characterized by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence of human influence. However, critics contend that the term is more cultural than scientific, pointing to the difficulty of defining a precise start date, with suggestions ranging from the advent of agriculture to the mid-20th century. They also note that geological epochs typically span millions of years, whereas human impact, though profound, is relatively recent. This debate highlights the tension between scientific classification and the urgency of environmental advocacy, raising questions about how we formalize our current era.
❓ 본문에 따르면, 인류세에 관한 비평가들 사이의 주요 논쟁점은 무엇인가?
A. A) 플라스틱 오염과 같은 충분한 지표의 부족
B. B) 명확하고 합의된 출발점을 설정하는 데 있어서의 어려움
C. C) 지질학적 과정에 대한 인간의 영향 부재
D. D) 문화적 용어로 분류되어야 하며, 과학적 용어가 아니라는 제안
✅ 正确答案
B) The difficulty in establishing a clear and agreed-upon starting point
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first