The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch characterized by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence of human influence. However, critics contend that the term is more cultural than scientific, pointing to the difficulty of defining a precise start date, with suggestions ranging from the advent of agriculture to the mid-20th century. They also note that geological epochs typically span millions of years, whereas human impact, though profound, is relatively recent. This debate highlights the tension between scientific classification and the urgency of environmental advocacy, raising questions about how we formalize our current era.
❓ この文章によると、批評家たちの間で人新世に関する主な論争点は何ですか?
A. A) プラスチック汚染などの十分なマーカーが不足していること
B. B) 明確で合意された出発点を確立することの難しさ
C. C) 地質学的プロセスに対する人間の影響の欠如
D. D) それは文化的な用語として分類されるべきであり、科学的な用語ではないという提案
✅ 正确答案
B) The difficulty in establishing a clear and agreed-upon starting point
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first