The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Unlike previous epochs, which were delineated by natural climatic shifts or biological events, the Anthropocene is marked by anthropogenic markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels. However, the formal recognition of this epoch remains contentious. Critics argue that the term oversimplifies the complex, uneven nature of human influence, which varies greatly across time and space. Proponents counter that the concept underscores humanity's collective responsibility for planetary stewardship, urging a unified response to environmental crises. The debate ultimately reflects broader questions about how science categorizes nature and our role within it.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 인류세의 공식적 인정에 대한 의견 불일치의 주요 이유는 무엇인가?
A. 제안된 시대의 지표들은 측정하기에 너무 어렵다.
B. B) 이 용어는 인간의 영향이 지니는 다양한 정도와 양상을 제대로 포착하지 못한다.
C. C) 지질학자들은 이 시기의 시작 날짜에 대해 의견이 일치하지 않는다.
D. D) 이 개념은 자연적 기후 변동의 역할을 무시한다.
✅ 正确答案
B) The term fails to capture the varying degrees and patterns of human impact.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first