The concept of 'planned obsolescence' has been a cornerstone of industrial design since the 1920s, yet its environmental and economic implications are increasingly scrutinized. Proponents argue that it stimulates innovation and consumer demand, driving economic growth. However, critics contend that it fosters a throwaway culture, leading to resource depletion and excessive waste. Recent studies suggest a shift towards 'circular economy' models, where products are designed for durability, repairability, and recyclability. This paradigm not only reduces environmental impact but also offers long-term cost savings for consumers. Nevertheless, implementing such models requires significant changes in manufacturing processes and consumer behavior, posing challenges for both industry and policy-makers. The debate thus highlights a tension between short-term economic gains and sustainable long-term practices.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 계획적 노후화에 대한 주요 반대 논거는 무엇인가?
A. 혁신의 필요성을 줄인다.
B. 이는 과도한 낭비와 자원 고갈로 이어집니다.
C. 이는 소비자에게 제품 가격을 인상시킵니다.
D. 경제 성장을 저해한다.
✅ 正确答案
It leads to excessive waste and resource depletion.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first