The concept of 'cultural intelligence' (CQ) has gained prominence in organizational psychology as a framework for understanding cross-cultural effectiveness. Unlike emotional intelligence, which focuses on interpersonal sensitivity within a familiar context, CQ specifically addresses the ability to adapt behavior to diverse cultural norms. Researchers argue that CQ comprises four dimensions: metacognitive (conscious awareness of cultural assumptions), cognitive (knowledge of cultural systems), motivational (interest in adapting), and behavioral (flexibility in actions). A pivotal study by Earley and Ang (2003) demonstrated that high CQ individuals outperform their peers in multicultural teams, not merely due to language proficiency, but through strategic observation and adjustment of communication styles. However, critics caution that CQ measurements rely heavily on self-reporting, which may inflate actual capability. Despite this limitation, CQ training programs are increasingly integrated into global leadership development, suggesting that cultural adaptability is a learnable skill rather than an innate trait.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 문화 지능 연구에 대한 주요 비판은 무엇인가?
A. A. 언어 능숙도를 행동 유연성보다 지나치게 강조한다.
B. B. 그 평가는 주관적인 자기 평가에 의존하므로 실제 능력을 과대평가할 수 있다.
C. C. 이는 문화 간 상황에서 감성 지능의 역할을 무시한다.
D. D. 개인의 특성에만 초점을 맞추며, 팀 역학을 간과한다.
✅ 正确答案
B. Its assessments depend on subjective self-evaluation, which may overestimate true ability.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first