The concept of 'cultural intelligence' (CQ) has gained prominence in organizational psychology as a measure of an individual's ability to function effectively in culturally diverse settings. Unlike emotional intelligence, which focuses on intrapersonal and interpersonal skills, CQ encompasses four distinct dimensions: metacognitive, cognitive, motivational, and behavioral. Metacognitive CQ refers to the conscious awareness of cultural assumptions during interactions, while cognitive CQ involves knowledge of norms and practices across cultures. Motivational CQ reflects the drive to adapt, and behavioral CQ is the capability to exhibit appropriate verbal and non-verbal actions. Research suggests that high CQ correlates with better job performance in multinational teams, yet critics argue that the construct overlaps with general cognitive ability and personality traits, questioning its discriminant validity. Nevertheless, CQ training programs have been adopted widely, though their long-term efficacy remains under debate.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 다음 중 문화적 지능(CQ)에 대한 주요 비판을 가장 잘 설명하는 것은 무엇인가?
A. 감성 지능과 너무 유사해서 유용하지 않다.
B. 그것은 일반적인 인지 능력 및 성격 특성과 구별되지 않을 수 있다.
C. 장기적으로 볼 때 그 훈련 프로그램들은 효과가 없다.
D. 행동적 측면에 너무 초점을 맞추고 지식을 무시한다.
✅ 正确答案
It may not be distinct from general cognitive ability and personality traits.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first